Update FMEA attribute name

[janis-qorix]

📌 Description

Change the name of an attribute within the FMEA in order to be more specific.
root_cause was updates to failure_root_cause

🚨 Impact Analysis

• This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
• This change does not violate any design decisions
• Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

• Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
• Added/updated tests to cover the changes
• Followed project coding standards and guidelines

[AlexanderLanin]

@janis-qorix thanks for the suggestion! Was this already discussed somewhere to rename the attribute?

ref gd_req__saf_attr_failure_root_cause only says Each FMEA may provide a short description of the root cause of the failure.

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

@janis-qorix thanks for the suggestion! Was this already discussed somewhere to rename the attribute?

ref gd_req__saf_attr_failure_root_cause only says Each FMEA may provide a short description of the root cause of the failure.

Ye this comes from the process template if I remember correctly.
It is failure_root_cause and should have been, it was just not correct here in DaC

[janis-qorix]

@janis-qorix thanks for the suggestion! Was this already discussed somewhere to rename the attribute?

ref gd_req__saf_attr_failure_root_cause only says Each FMEA may provide a short description of the root cause of the failure.

@PandaeDo and I discussed this while maintaining the persistency FMEA. This Update shall bring more clarity within the safety analyses.

[github-actions]

Documentation preview for this pull request is available at:
pr-916: https://eclipse-score.github.io/docs-as-code/pr-916/

[a-zw]

Is there a corresponding update in gd_req__saf_attr_failure_root_cause[version==2] maybe?

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

No, cause this does only describe that it hsould be there.

The actually term is only described in the template which has no versioning ;/
Although it may should be the safety guide versioning then, or am I wrong?
@PandaeDo @janis-qorix

https://github.com/eclipse-score/process_description/blob/e05729bac856afffc3040c13495dd40736d13d48/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_guideline.rst#safety-analysis-guidelines

[janis-qorix]

I reset the version to 1, since there were no major changes included within the content of the requirement but only the naming itself.

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

@a-zw @AlexanderLanin thoughts on this?
Should we keep it version 1 or version 2 since the name of the attr changed?